Do you think paparazzi should be restricted?
Man 1: I personally feel like paparazzi is a double edged sword. I mean it is the price you pay and also catapults your celebrity but should there be a line? Perhaps. It gets a bit dangerous when Britney is driving around and there is fifteen to thirty cars following her, she is trying to speed away from them, Princesses Diana, there has been a lot of incidences of paparazzi going too far where you draw that the freedom of speech, it is hard. Man 2 : I don't think that's where it goes wrong. Sure they follow her a lot but Britney has welcomed these people into her life, they are part of her life, she accepts them into her car, she takes them into her house. That is her deal, her own deal, and honestly she wouldn't have much of a career without that. Man 1: That's all she has right now. Man 2 : Lets minus Britney and the paparazzi from the equation and now lets put in the real line which is paparazzi and kids. For a lot of stars, paparazzi and kids don't mix. For Julia Roberts, George Clooney, Reese Witherspoon and the A-listers, they really don't want their kids to be photographed because they don't want them to end up like Britney and Paris. So that is the line in Hollywood and I think that is the well respected line Man 1: Yes whether the police enforce that, whether the public enforce it, and the media seems to respect that line better now with Britney you know Nicole's kid is very held back from the press, and I think that the press does respects that because the child is not asking to be famous, their father and their mother is. Man 2: But then of course you have got Nicole Ritchie, Christiana Aguilera and Britney Spears all selling their baby pictures. It is different in Hollywood and for the old Hollywood, the line is kids.
